Sam (
l33tminion) wrote2006-08-10 04:27 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Halftime, Eh?
A quick comment on the Connecticut primary yesterday: I'm glad Lieberman lost. Maybe the guy isn't the false-flag Democrat that some want to portray him as, but he's not particularly liberal. This shows that primary elections have some meaning, even when the party in question has an incumbent. Plus, the worst-case scenario is that Lieberman wins as an independent.
As usual, John Stewart gets it.
As usual, John Stewart gets it.
no subject
But, unlike you, I'm not glad Lieberman lost. I think the Democratic Party is now playing a dangerous game, where the litmus test for acceptability is hatred off George Bush and "Bush's War". Lieberman's one of the few Senate Democrats I respect (the few senators, for that matter).
I'm sure there'll be comparisons between Lieberman's loss and Joe Schwarz' loss in MI-7. My problem is this: on most issues, Lieberman is a mainstream Dem: pro-choice, anti-gun, pro-enviro, anti-tax cut, etc. He has a few more centrist impulses, one of which is toward compromise where possible. In this sense I find him not unlike a Specter or a McCain or a Hagel. Joe Schwarz is not anywhere near the mainstream of the Republican Party--in this sense, he is more a Chafee or a Zell Miller.
Oh, and for what it's worth, hacking his site is cheap. Very, very cheap.
Alan Schlessinger for US Senate!
no subject
Second, I hope I'm not implying that I don't respect Lieberman. I do.
Oh, and for what it's worth, hacking his site is cheap. Very, very cheap.
I agree (obviously, I hope). I'd be very surprised (and upset) if the person who did that was working for Lamont or the Democratic Party, though.
no subject
OK--disrespect was not implied in the least.
I'd be upset but, honestly, not overly surprised.
yeah, next time:
Re: yeah, next time: