2026 MA Questions
Oct. 15th, 2026 12:58 pmElected officials: Straight-ticket Democrats. But surely you could have guessed that. In MA, it's often the Dem primary that's the real election. Governor at least was an exception, but Trump has destroyed the political habitat of the Massachusetts Republican. (So far just metaphorically, despite his best efforts.)
Question 1 - Make public records law apply to the legislature and governor's office: Yes. Most states don't have this exemption, generally I'm in favor of more transparency even if in practice this will lead to a lot of disputes over exactly what is covered.
Question 2 - Allow government-employed public defenders to unionize: Yes. There are surely complicated tradeoffs with public-sector unions, but dealing with it via per-job carve-outs like this seems like not a good way to do things.
Question 3 - Have all-parties "jungle" primary elections: No. This doesn't avoid weird strategic voting, it just results in different weird strategic voting. Also it results in the weird scenario where CA is perpetually worried abut having two Republicans in the general election for governor despite that not representing the preferences of the electorate at all. There's a better solution for this sort of thing, but it failed to pass in 2020.
Question 4 - Allow election day voter registration: Yes. Some states have this, and I don't think there's a good reason for this process to be slow.
Question 5 - Cap tax revenues: No. This is not sound fiscal policy. When growth is high, the desirability of infrastructure spending is higher. This is also intended as a sneaky way to effectively repeal this 2022 measure.
Question 6 - Reserve some sales tax revenue for a nature preservation fund: No. This specifically earmarks sales tax revenue from some categories of goods for nature preservation, but I think splitting sales tax revenue "vertically" this way makes even less sense in terms of tradeoffs than allocating a certain portion of all sales tax revenues to particular purposes.
Question 7 - Allow more single-family homes: Yes. This is a minimal YIMBY bit of legislation that doesn't let towns prohibit even single-family homes on lots at least 5000 sq. ft. The median lot size in my town is 3000 sq. ft. If you own 5000 sq. ft. of land it shouldn't be illegal to build a house there because your neighbors want to impose some kind of a mansions-only policy.
Question 8 - Make marijuana illegal again: No. As much as I dislike having a million dispensaries everywhere.
Question 9 - Uphold a state gun safety law: Yes. The summary of the law seems pretty reasonable. Personally, I think guns should be at least as regulated as cars and wish my polity was like one of the many polities that thinks it's possible to maintain freedom without it being normal for people to routinely carry around firearms at all. But anyways I think MA can safely leave saying we're not allowed to do any of that to the Supreme Court.