Sam (
l33tminion) wrote2007-06-02 10:05 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
An Analysis of Recent Drama
I want to link to this essay, entitled How Six Apart's Greed Allied Them With Neo-Nazis, on the the recent mass banning (and subsequent apology and slightly-less-mass unbanning) and the resultant controversy. It's a good look at the conflict between a blogging service business's desire to make money and their desire to not anger their users by showing respect for free speech.
(Note: I'm not saying that Six Apart (the company that owns LJ) has any obligation to respect free speech, as they're a business, not the government. Nonetheless, too much disrespect for free speech could be bad for business, since bloggers generally don't like the threat of censorship, and it isn't too hard to go elsewhere.)
(Also, here's a link to an older version of the essay on LJ, in case you want to comment and you'd rather comment there.)
(Note: I'm not saying that Six Apart (the company that owns LJ) has any obligation to respect free speech, as they're a business, not the government. Nonetheless, too much disrespect for free speech could be bad for business, since bloggers generally don't like the threat of censorship, and it isn't too hard to go elsewhere.)
(Also, here's a link to an older version of the essay on LJ, in case you want to comment and you'd rather comment there.)
no subject
no subject
I feel sort of bad for Six Apart. I can't see how this could have ended without "LiveJournal" and "pedophiles" mentioned in the same news story.
no subject
What I just think about all this is that Six Apart made a choice to purchase LJ, but if they can't run it how its users want it to run, their investment was a total waste.