Loopholes

Jun. 18th, 2005 01:10 am
l33tminion: (Free Speech Zone)
One quick thing to share.

Recently, there's been some talk in the news about the possibility of a draft. On that note, I found this article that claims a draft is unconstitutional (which makes sense, as the Thirteenth Amendment outlaws "involuntary servitude"). Apparently, the government has gotten around this by using a loophole, getting draftees to "volunteer" without telling them that they cannot legally be forced to do so.

The article states that there is a precedent for people avoiding the draft by refusing to step forward and swear allegiance (and thus "volunteering"). I don't know if that precedent would be upheld under the current administration, but I think the article is worth reading anyways.

Oh, CRA-

Apr. 10th, 2005 12:22 pm
l33tminion: (Default)
As long as I'm in the "we're all doomed" section of the news, Congress is attempting to take the first steps yet another step towards bringing theocracy to America. The CRA, or Christ Risen Again Constitution Restoration Act, will bar ANY federal court or judge from reviewing "any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an entity of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer or agent of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official or personal capacity), concerning that entity's, officer's, or agent's acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government." (emphasis every rational person's) This would allow any state that does not offer (or enforce) the freedom of religion protections given in the Constitution to turn itself into a theocracy, without any possibility of federal intervention.

From this article: "The CRA already has 28 sponsors in the House and Senate, and a March 20 call to lead sponsor Sen. Richard Shelby's office assures us that 'we have the votes for passage.'"
l33tminion: (Default)
Because I was reminded by the recent fuss in the news, I got a living will. To summarize: If I am in a terminal or permanently unconscious state and unable to communicate, don't try to keep me alive.

So that's all signed and official, which is kind of a relief. It's the sort of thing that you hope you'll never need, but once you need it it's rather too late.

Regardless of whether Terri Schiavo is suffering or not, I am even more certain of something else: Both Mr. Schiavo and Terri's parents are suffering more than they would be if Terri had any kind of advanced directive (be it a Living Will, a Will to Live, or some other sort of Durable Power of Attourney for Healthcare document regarding this sort of situation). It's the sort of situation where the people who are left making decisions are under tremendous duress, which will complicate their attempts to act in their loved ones best interests. It makes the situation better for all involved to spell out what one's wishes are in advance.

Issues

Mar. 18th, 2005 04:47 pm
l33tminion: (Default)
You've all probably heard about the recent decision regarding same-sex marriage in California. I think the judge's argument, "The State's protracted denial of equal protection cannot be justified simply because such constitutional violation has become traditional," is extremely sound. And the judge, Richard Kramer, is conservative. From what I've read, it seems that the man is dedicated to justice, not to some political organization.

I may often disagree with people's political opinions, but even when there is no agreement, it is good to be able to understand the other side's argument. This is why the real divide in American politics scares me so much.


Another news item I want to comment on is the recent developments in the unfortunate situation regarding Terri Schiavo. After much discussion and debate with [livejournal.com profile] conuly and others, I have clarified my thoughts on the issue.

My Thoughts on the Issue )
l33tminion: (Default)
Look. I am lost for words.
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 05:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios