l33tminion: (Default)
As the election approaches, I continue to be filled with dread. The rhetoric from Trump and co is so much worse than it was in 2016. Which would've been kind of hard to imagine in 2016, but the "moderate Republicans" Trump felt he had to appeal to somewhat in 2016 are nonexistent now, at least as far as he's concerned.

The flood damage from the last hurricane was severe, the next hurricane looks terrifying. And it seems like the GOP will lie about and outright sabotage the federal response to any disaster because they believe an effective response would be to Harris's political advantage.

On the world stage, the now-year-long war between Israel and Hamas threatens to widen into a wider regional war. This reflection by Israeli-American historian Omer Bartov has been on my metaphorical desk for some time. I think it's insightful, though I don't have insight to add. I also want to share Scott Aaronson's post here and second his call for nations offering refugee status to those who seek to leave the conflict zone. (But I'm pretty much always in favor of more acceptance of refugees who seek to live their lives in peace.)

I really don't want another Trump Presidency. I really don't want to have to explain any of this.
l33tminion: Wandering into the wasteland (Exile)
I'll have time to talk about more prosaic things on the home front eventually, maybe, but to add to this year's parade of horrors, Israel is now at war, kicked off by Hamas launching a brutal series of cross-border terrorist attacks. It's been appalling to see some nominally-liberal people completely lose the plot with this, to the extent that they ever had it. Hamas are a bunch of nihilistic monsters. There's a difference between recognizing that injustice and desperation are conditions that bring out the worst in people (and help the already-worst people rise to prominence and power) and thinking that the worst in people is actually somehow good. Some means are never justified, and "ends justifies the means" arguments also require that the ends be both good and achievable. Hamas aren't going to accomplish any larger geopolitical end, and it would be terrible if they did.

I'm terrified that Israel is heading towards ends that are similarly genocidal. (Reports that the Netenyahu government actively bolstered Hamas and dismissed warnings about the current attack increase my fears that they are also willing or even hoping to have the situation tumble over some sort of precipice.) Hopes of a two-state solution seem dead, there's only so much de facto control someone can have over a territory before you start to seriously damage your ability to comprehend the situation by denying that de facto sovereignty, even if you were trying to hold space for some once-potential future.

Israel (the world, but especially Israel) has a powerful need to change the circumstances of the people in Gaza and the West Bank. As powerful, perhaps, as the Palestinians' need to change their own circumstances. Enacting that change through mass displacement or mass murder is simply not acceptable. Expecting that the status quo can be maintained while things get worse forever is not reasonable. It's too important to be about whose need is greater or who is more responsible. It's too important not to put the burden on whoever can get it done. Which includes Israel, if anyone. It sure seems like a task where having a functioning economy, an actual military, and pluralistic, democratic political institutions (to the extent that it does and can keep them) would help.

Then again, maybe no one is up to the task. It's easy to succumb to despair.

There is a powerful need in the world for justice and peace. You can't have the former without the latter. Good luck getting the latter without the former. An attitude of "we'll have peace after one last settling of scores" won't get it. There is some sense in which the wrongs of the past can never be righted, the past is immutable. At best you can right the wrongs of the present, a task that needs grounding in historical context but is not the same as turning back the clock.

Still, modern history does have its share of cases where vicious, hateful conflicts somehow managed to end. It's not impossible. It's maybe not impossible.

#Flotilla

Jun. 2nd, 2010 11:47 pm
l33tminion: (Pirate Hat)
(Cross-posted.)

This Monday, Israeli forces boarded and captured the "Gaza Freedom Flotilla", a convoy of ships carrying food and medicine to the besieged territory of Gaza. Nine activists were killed, many more activists and some Israeli soldiers were injured.

Gaza has been under a near-total blockade since 2007, though Israel formally ended their occupation in 2005 and denies that their near total control of the land, sea, and air borders, complete blockade (save for limited humanitarian aid imports), and complete prohibition of any kind of military development qualifies them for any of the responsibilities of an occupying power. It's not clear at all that the blockade is legal under international law.

Meanwhile, the organizers of the flotilla had a stated intention of breaking the Israeli blockade, but they were sailing under the Turkish flag (the lead ship was a Turkish ship, the convoy departed from a Turkish port, though the vessels in the convoy were from a bunch of different countries) and attacked in international waters. The activists claim that Israeli soldiers fired on them before boarding, Israel claims the soldiers only returned fire after coming under attack (with improvised weapons and their own weapons).

There's a lot of interesting stuff going on here. More... )
l33tminion: (Default)
Today, Wikileaks released a video of US military massacring over a dozen unarmed civilians in Bagdhad, including two Reuters journalists and civilians trying to evacuate the wounded, injuring some civilian children in the process. The attack occurred on July 12, 2007. After the attack, the US government falsely claimed that the journalists were killed in the midst of combat, but the cameras were confiscated and the government refused to release their own video despite FOIA requests from Reuters. The encrypted video (along with substantiating documents) were given to Wikileaks by an anonymous source or sources within the military, the encryption was cracked through brute force (apparently).

Yesterday, a Chinese ship ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef. The ship is carrying hundreds of 65,000 tons of coal and 300,000 gallons of fuel oil. So far, no major spills, but salvage crews are still worried that the ship might break apart.

Also yesterday, a major earthquake hit Mexicali, Mexico. This is quite a year for earthquakes, evidently.
l33tminion: (Free Speech Zone)
Greg Palast published an article blasting the US Government for their slow response to the disaster in Haiti:

The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson finally showed up after three days. With what? It was dramatically deployed — without any emergency relief supplies. It has sidewinder missiles and 19 helicopters...

But don't worry, the International Search and Rescue Team, fully equipped and self-sufficient for up to seven days in the field, deployed immediately with ten metric tons of tools and equipment, three tons of water, tents, advanced communication equipment and water purifying capability. They're from Iceland.

Gates wouldn't send in food and water because, he said, there was no "structure ... to provide security." For Gates, appointed by Bush and allowed to hang around by Obama, it's security first. That was his lesson from Hurricane Katrina. Blackwater before drinking water.
[emphasis his]

Iceland has their humanitarian forces deployed within the day, China within 48 hours. The US is much slower to respond, though we have military bases very close by. We have a military that can get bombs and missiles to any part of the world on very short notice, but when it comes to dispatching humanitarian aid, we're slow. Why can't we match Iceland? Why don't we have a humanitarian strike team capable of supplying and defending themselves, ready to go anywhere in the world and facilitate disaster response on a moment's notice? Why do we spend so much money and so many soldiers' lives to kill terrorists, when terrorism is a relatively small threat to global security? And when it comes to terrorism, why do we neglect the most basic method: Make fewer people hate us, and of the people who hate us, make fewer hate us intensely?

Part of this is standing US policy that Haiti cannot succeed, even if we have to personally prevent them from having a semblance of democracy. But it's not just Haiti. Rather, conservative* opposition to liberal pacifism has led them to romanticize war to such a degree that they oppose, on principle, nonviolent approaches to security. That belief is backed by rationalizations. In Haiti, there is the (so far completely unsubstantiated) assumption that desperate Haitians are likely to turn to violence en masse. In the War on Terror, I've heard conservatives more explicitly state that "those people only understand violence". And those rationalizations are often so strongly overstated that they rule out not only non-violent solutions, but any solution that isn't ill-considered, indiscriminate violence. That's why the US lacks a humanitarian strike team with effectiveness equivalent to Iceland's. Only a liberal could think such a team would be an effective way of protecting US (or even global) security in the grim darkness of our apocalyptic present.

* Yes, the Democrats are in charge now, but US military and national security policy are very deeply conservative. In part, this is because the conservatives were in charge during 9/11 and the start of the War on Terror, which is why you see, for example, Gates being kept on as Secretary of Defense. More importantly, it's because of right-wing control of the media, liberals have very bad PR on security in particular.
l33tminion: There's that sense of impending doom again (Doom)
Unfortunately, that last post isn't all that's been on my mind lately. The news has been rather depressing (and/or alarming):

On Monday, a woman was crushed by a three-ton piece of falling concrete in one of the Big Dig road tunnels. Investigators have since found that the tunnel is totally falling apart.

Yesterday, 174 people were killed and 464 injured in a series of bomb attacks on trains in Mumbai.

Today, Israel attacked Lebanon in retaliation for the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers by Hizbullah guerrillas (backed by Iran). Israel struck hundreds of targets (including the Beirut airport). They've mobilized their reserves in preparation for an attack, and claimed that the terrorists plan to move their hostages to Iran. Sploid has an excellent summary of these events (complete with tinfoil-hattery), cheerily titled World War III.

The price of oil is currently $79.99 a barrel (it hit a peak of $78.35 today).
l33tminion: (Default)
Well, my family arrives in town tomorrow. I don't know if I'll be online within the next few days (although I'll try to be on some), but I'll be off all of next week, as I'll be at Sandy Island Camp (I've gone there every year, except last year, since I was two).

A few more links to share:

One on Zarqari. Apparently, we don't want to leave Iraq to terrorists like him. On the other hand, apparently the administration could have taken him out before the Iraq war, but they let him get away. Now why would they have done that?

Scientists raise the dead. Muah! (Seriously, it's about cryogenic suspension, but I'm adding the "zombies" tag to this entry anyway.)

Finally, on the subject of everyone's favorite "scientific" non-theory, all praise the Flying Spaghetti Monster!
l33tminion: (Default)
I took today off work because I'm currently limited to 20 hrs. a week, even though I would rather work a 25-30 hr. schedule. With any luck, I'll be able to get increased hours next week.

Anime club was fun.

A few items of news to share: Apparently, Ohio Republicans lost $10M from the Workers' Compensation fund when they invested the money in rare coins. [livejournal.com profile] alternet has an article on the Downing Street Minutes. And, speaking of GOP corruption, a House subcommittee just passed a proposal that would devastate public broadcasting by substantially cutting its funding.
l33tminion: (Default)
Iraqi Insurgents Hold GI Joe Hostage. (I'm not kidding.)
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 05:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios